What are the opposite words for solids?

Solids are defined as substances that have a fixed shape and volume. They are opposite of liquids and gases, which do not have a fixed shape or volume. Antonyms for the word "solids" include "liquids" and "gases". Liquids are substances that have a fixed volume but not a fixed shape, and they flow to take the shape of their container. Gases are substances that do not have a fixed volume or shape and expand to fill their container. Other antonyms for solids include "liquids" and "fluids". Fluids refer to substances that flow and take the shape of their container, including both liquids and gases. Overall, the antonyms for solids indicate substances that have more fluid and less rigid characteristics.

What are the antonyms for Solids?

• n.

  • block
  • opening
  .
  • lump
  • depression
  ,
  • individual
  ,
  • little
  ,
  • one
  .
  • sediment
  • possessions
  ,
  • whole
  .

• v.

  • unbroken
  • broken
  ,
  • discontinuous
  ,
  • inconstant
  ,
  • intermittent
  ,
  • partial
  .

• Other relevant words:

• divided
.

Usage examples for Solids

Famous quotes with Solids

• Everything you've learned in school as obvious becomes less and less obvious as you begin to study the universe. For example, there are no solids in the universe. There's not even a suggestion of a solid. There are no absolute continuums. There are no surfaces. There are no straight lines.

  Richard Buckminster Fuller
• The problem comes up because we ask the question in the wrong way. We supposed that solids were one thing and space quite another, or just nothing whatever. Then it appeared that space was no mere nothing, because solids couldn't do without it. But the mistake in the beginning was to think of solids and space as two different things, instead of as two aspects of the same thing. The point is that they are different but inseparable, like the front end and the rear end of a cat. Cut them apart, and the cat dies. Take away the crest of the wave, and there is no trough. Here is someone who has never seen a cat. He is looking through a narrow slit in a fence, and, on the other side, a cat walks by. He sees first the head, then the less distinctly shaped furry trunk, and then the tail. Extraordinary! The cat turns round and walks back, and again he sees the head, and a little later the tail. This sequence begins to look like something regular and reliable. Yet again, the cat turns round, and he witnesses the same regular sequence: first the head, and later the tail. Thereupon he reasons that the event head is the invariable and necessary cause of the event tail, which is the head's effect. This absurd and confusing gobbledygook comes from his failure to see that head and tail go together: they are all one cat. The cat wasn't born as a head which, sometime later, caused a tail; it was born all of a piece, a head-tailed cat. Our observer's trouble was that he was watching it through a narrow slit, and couldn't see the whole cat at once.

  Alan Watts
• Perhaps the first to approach the fourth dimension from the side of physics, was the Frenchman, Nicole Oresme, of the fourteenth century. In a manuscript treatise, he sought a graphic representation of the Aristotelian forms, such as heat, velocity, sweetness, by laying down a line as a basis designated , and taking one of the forms to be represented by lines (straight or circular) perpendicular to this either as a or an . The form was thus represented graphically by a surface. Oresme extended this process by taking a surface as the basis which, together with the latitudo, formed a solid. Proceeding still further, he took a solid as a basis and upon each point of this solid he entered the increment. He saw that this process demanded a fourth dimension which he rejected; he overcame the difficulty by dividing the solid into numberless planes and treating each plane in the same manner as the plane above, thereby obtaining an infinite number of solids which reached over each other. He uses the phrase "fourth dimension" (4 ).

  Nicole Oresme
• The bodies of which the world is composed are solids, and therefore have three dimensions. Now, three is the most perfect number,—it is the first of numbers, for of we do not speak as a number, of we say both, but is the first number of which we say . Moreover, it has a beginning, a middle, and an end.

  Aristotle
• Theodorus of Cyrene and Theaetetus generalised the theory of irrationals, and we may safely conclude that a great part of the substance of Euclid's Book X. (on irrationals) was due to Theætetus. Theætetus also wrote on the five regular solids, and Euclid was therefore no doubt equally indebted to Theætetus for the contents of his Book XIII. In the matter of Book XII. Eudoxus was the pioneer. These facts are confirmed by the remark of Proclus that Euclid, in compiling his Elements, collected many of the theorems of Eudoxus, perfected many others by Theætetus, and brought to irrefragable demonstration the propositions which had only been somewhat loosely proved by his predecessors.

  Thomas Little Heath

Related words & questions

Related words: 3D printing, 3d printer, 3d printing service, 3d printers, 3d printing price, 3d printer price, 3d printer reviews, 3D model, learn how to design a 3D model

Related questions:

Does a 3d printer work like a printer?

What is a 3d printer for kids?

Middle Class Populations

The antonyms for the term "Middle Class Populations" are "extreme poverty populations" and "wealthy high-class populations." Extreme poverty populations refer to people who suffer ...